Skip to main content



A Case on Who Bears Risk of Loss - the Seller or the Buyer?

The Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island has issued a new decision that addresses the issue of which party should bear the cost of goods that spoil at sea (W.D. Potato Limited v. Visser Potato Ltd., 2018 PESC 51).

As you might expect from PEI, the case concerned a load of potatoes. The facts are easy. The seller of those potatoes was W.D Potato Ltd. ("WD"), a potato broker. The buyer was Visser Potato Ltd. ("Visser"), another broker, who needed additional potatoes to fulfill an order to a client in Argentina. When the potatoes arrived in Argentina, they were discovered to be rotten, having apparently spoiled at sea. For unknown reasons the shipping company that carried the potatoes was not a party to the lawsuit. The issue the court was asked to decide was who, as between WD and Visser, should swallow the loss. The contract between the parties (which was a basic letter) included the term "FOB farm".

The court ultimately sided with WD concluding that:


Latest Posts

"Shipping and Environmental Leadership Act" introduced in US Senate - Implications for Arctic Shipping

A Canoe is a Vessel for the Purposes of the Criminal Code

Only Deliberate Disposal at Sea is an Offence Under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999

Working in the Marine Industry: Does Federal or Provincial Employment Law Apply?

Two Decisions Dealing with the Fallout of OpenHydro

Federal Government Proposes Changes to the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 and the Marine Liability Act. Implications for autonomous vessel research, oil pollution events and access to compensation under the Ship Source Oil Pollution Fund.

Another Case Confirming That Municipalities can Regulate Moored Houseboats Etc.