Skip to main content



Update on the MV Marathassa

You’ll recall that in November, 2018 the British Columbia Provincial Court decided that the MV "Marathassa" was not guilty of charges under section 125(1) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), which prohibits the unauthorized disposal of a substance at sea (see my previous post here: 
In that case, the court concluded that CEPA provision did not apply because the spill in question, an accidental leak of some 2700 litres of fuel oil into Vancouver's English Bay, was not alleged by the Crown to be intentional - i.e. CEPA does not apply to accidental discharges - only intentional ones - and evidence must be led accordingly. Lawyers for the Marathassa essentially (and successfully) argued that the proper legislative regime which relates to allegations of the accidental release of oil into the sea is the Canada Shipping Act, particularly s. 187, which states that: s. 187. No pe…

Latest Posts

Still No Free-Market for NWT Fisherman

Ship Source Oil Pollution Fund Wins Summary Judgement Motion Against Tracey Dodds

Cannabis & Maritime Labour

New Case: What happens if you sell a vessel and forget to cancel the registration?

A Case on Who Bears Risk of Loss - the Seller or the Buyer?

"Shipping and Environmental Leadership Act" introduced in US Senate - Implications for Arctic Shipping

A Canoe is a Vessel for the Purposes of the Criminal Code

Only Deliberate Disposal at Sea is an Offence Under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999